42-102867 bb small.jpg
Attention Shoppers 42-102867
Attention Shoppers 42-102867
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- Chris Brame
- Posts: 587
- Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 12:08 am
- Location: Yucca Valley, CA
Re: Attention Shoppers 42-102867
Very, very interesting. Here's the record card:
First time I've seen a Laredo plane(s) with large two-digit codes on the nose; here's her sister, '868, at Laredo:
Every one I've seen until now had the small three-digit codes. #17 in the background, 44-6044, was at Laredo too per Osborne:
First time I've seen a Laredo plane(s) with large two-digit codes on the nose; here's her sister, '868, at Laredo:
Every one I've seen until now had the small three-digit codes. #17 in the background, 44-6044, was at Laredo too per Osborne:
Do you have a link to the auction?44-6044 Del Tulsa 15/4/44; Ft Myers 27/4/44; 2118 BU Buckingham 2/6/44; 2126 BU Laredo 1/2/45; RFC Walnut Ridge 12/10/45.
- Chris Brame
- Posts: 587
- Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 12:08 am
- Location: Yucca Valley, CA
Re: Attention Shoppers 42-102867
See if he can zoom in on the serial under the wing of #10 - the serial on the tail ends in 77 which for Laredo would be either 42-39877 or 42-102877 (probably the latter?). I have this shot of '2877 as Laredo #230 from the accident report:
Doesn't look like a 10 was stripped off the nose, but...
Doesn't look like a 10 was stripped off the nose, but...
Re: Attention Shoppers 42-102867
Just received the Digit copy
Aircraft 12: 42-102867
Aircraft 10: 42-102877 (numbers under wing is a long serial)
Aircraft 17: 44-6044
Aircraft 20: 44-6051
Aircraft 14: 42-102878
Aircraft 12: 42-102867
Aircraft 10: 42-102877 (numbers under wing is a long serial)
Aircraft 17: 44-6044
Aircraft 20: 44-6051
Aircraft 14: 42-102878
- Chris Brame
- Posts: 587
- Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 12:08 am
- Location: Yucca Valley, CA
Re: Attention Shoppers 42-102867
Cool! Record card for '877:
And '878:
I'm detecting a pattern here. Maybe these two-digit codes were for Buckingham rather than Laredo? Looks like all of them went there first.
And '878:
I'm detecting a pattern here. Maybe these two-digit codes were for Buckingham rather than Laredo? Looks like all of them went there first.