And yet one more 17 with a question

Post here with anything to do with warbirds, those fine vintage flying machines.
Post Reply
Dan Johnson
Posts: 296
Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2006 1:14 pm
Location: Rosemount, Minnesota

And yet one more 17 with a question

Post by Dan Johnson »

This on intrigues me. Image is dated April 24, 1945 so the airwar in the ETO is about done and 17s weren't going to the PTO.

A training relatively early B17F still on the job. Turrets in place and gun mounts visible. Paint has been stripped. Not sure why this bird would still be in that configuration. I'd think they'd have wanted training 17s by that point to be G models with the same turrets etc that the crews would have had in combat. Why keep this bird going like that? Someone's personal favorite?

Anyway, since it's been quiet in here I thought I'd throw it out here to see if anyone has any idea to explain this bird

Image
User avatar
Chris Brame
Posts: 587
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 12:08 am
Location: Yucca Valley, CA

Re: And yet one more 17 with a question

Post by Chris Brame »

This is either 42-30044 or 42-40044; I'm thinking the latter, because there's a photo of it in Ontario, CA on page 18 of the fifth edition of Final Cut, and it's in bare metal. It had an oddly-painted tail code "L-1" from its last use at Minter Field:
Image
terveurn
Posts: 885
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 1:39 am

Re: And yet one more 17 with a question

Post by terveurn »

why wouldn't B-17F still be used as valuable training ships - they were only 2-years old.

Still very good for Pilot transition trainers, navigation trainers and flex gunnery ships. Except for the lack of chin turrets (as well as the difference in supercharger controls) the F's were still valuable, low time aircraft. Even the Memphis Belle was still used at MacDill until June 1945
Post Reply