Scott gave me a challenge -- said his list on B-25's did not include any B-25D modified to F-10D standard
now he knows I love a challenge -- so here is the Air Force Museum's F-10D before she was converted to B-25B.
Air Force Museum's F-10D
Air Force Museum's F-10D
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 899
- Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2004 9:03 pm
- Location: Lincoln, California
- Contact:
Re: Air Force Museum's F-10D
Well, just to clarify a bit: my contention was, and is, that the ten B-25Ds that were converted for the photo mission were redesignated as just F-10s, more exactly F-10-NK, with no suffix letter. This is based on John Andrade's mostly definitive U.S. Military Aircraft Designations and Serials.
James Fahey's exposition says the same thing.
Thus, not F-10D. So, the NMUSAF display aircraft (43-3374) went from B-25D to F-10 to RB-25D. Perhaps a record card can be definitive but, alas, I don't have it. Just my 2 cents.
James Fahey's exposition says the same thing.
Thus, not F-10D. So, the NMUSAF display aircraft (43-3374) went from B-25D to F-10 to RB-25D. Perhaps a record card can be definitive but, alas, I don't have it. Just my 2 cents.
Scott Thompson
Aero Vintage Books
http://www.aerovintage.com
"The Webmaster, More or Less"
Aero Vintage Books
http://www.aerovintage.com
"The Webmaster, More or Less"
Re: Air Force Museum's F-10D
I do not think these guys even know -- for example the accident report for 41-29885 has her listed as a F-10C-NA (16 December 1944) (next to bottom line)
If anything, she would be a Kansas City (NC) aircraft.
Accident report has her ID's three ways to Sunday - B-24D, F-10, F-10C-NA......
If anything, she would be a Kansas City (NC) aircraft.
Accident report has her ID's three ways to Sunday - B-24D, F-10, F-10C-NA......
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Posts: 296
- Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2006 1:14 pm
- Location: Rosemount, Minnesota