Page 1 of 1
Question about 41-24574 Tuffy
Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2017 11:33 am
by Steve Birdsall
Tuffy, 41-24574, flew with the 43rd Bomb Group from Australia and New Guinea.
I’m interested in anything about the movements of this B-17F between when it returned to the U.S. in November 1943 and when it went to Altus for salvage in August 1945.
A photo of it taken at Lockbourne turned up recently on eBay, but there were no details at all in the caption. The photo was date-stamped August 1945 but that may be just the date it was filed away.
Any help will be very welcome. I thought I had an old photocopy of the IARC but if I did I can’t find it.
Re: Question about 41-24574 Tuffy
Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2017 11:49 am
by varsity07840
I've always thought it was odd, given the variety of armament modifications done to 5th AF bombers, that B-17Fs weren't modified to accept .50 cal nose guns in a manner similar to field mods done by the 8th AF.
Re: Question about 41-24574 Tuffy
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2017 4:39 am
by Chris Brame
Dave Osborne's list has this:
41-24574 Del Cheyenne 12/8/42; Hamilton 9/11/42; Ass 63BS & 403BS/43BG Mareeba, Aus 14/11/42; Milne Bay, NG 23/11/42; Mareeba, Aus 21/1/43; Port Moresby, NG 11/5/43; RetUS Rapid City 9/11/42 (398BG training at Walker Fd, Kan); RFC Altus 30/8/45. TUFFY.
Re: Question about 41-24574 Tuffy
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2017 10:29 pm
by Steve Birdsall
To be honest, I've never quite understood that entry in Dave Osborne's list. I know he worked from the IARCs, with input from Roger Freeman and many others (including me). The 398th was employed as an OTU before going overseas - from July to December 1943 - and was at Rapid City from June 1943 until early April 1944.
Re: Question about 41-24574 Tuffy
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2017 11:24 pm
by terveurn
That is part of the problem with the Master index -- way too many short-cuts.
There was a bunch of Bomb groups that staged through Rapid City in 1943 and any one of them could have used this aircraft as a temporary training aircraft.
The best way is to order the Rapid city AAF CD and see what show's-up -- I did this with Sioux City and found a radio school that was still using B-17B's & D to train (radio procedures) until August 1944
rapid city mine.JPG
CD B2487 looks interesting
http://airforcehistoryindex.org/data/000/176/955.xml
INTENDED FOR TRAINING IN HEAVY BOMBARDMENT AIRCRAFT. 28 SEP 42, FIRST B-17 AIRCRAFT ARRIVED
Full index for B2487
http://airforcehistoryindex.org/search.php?q=B2487
Full index for B2488
http://airforcehistoryindex.org/search.php?q=B2488
Re: Question about 41-24574 Tuffy
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 2:29 am
by Chris Brame
Steve Birdsall wrote:
A photo of it taken at Lockbourne turned up recently on eBay, but there were no details at all in the caption. The photo was date-stamped August 1945 but that may be just the date it was filed away.
Is the Lockbourne photo the one in the first post? If not, do you have a link to the completed auction? I looked through nearly 600 completed listings yesterday and didn't find it.
Did find another Alexandria trainer photo, so I ain't complaining!
Re: Question about 41-24574 Tuffy
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 7:47 am
by terveurn
Chris Brame wrote:Steve Birdsall wrote:
A photo of it taken at Lockbourne turned up recently on eBay, but there were no details at all in the caption. The photo was date-stamped August 1945 but that may be just the date it was filed away.
Is the Lockbourne photo the one in the first post? If not, do you have a link to the completed auction? I looked through nearly 600 completed listings yesterday and didn't find it.
Did find another Alexandria trainer photo, so I ain't complaining!
600 complete listings from e-bay in one day -- you got me beat....
Re: Question about 41-24574 Tuffy
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 10:54 am
by Steve Birdsall
No, I never saw the original listing . . . then stumbled on this while I was looking for something else.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/1945-Press-Phot ... 7675.l2557
As you'll see, the caption doesn't really help. Maybe the photo was used in a newspaper story but I haven't found it.
Re: Question about 41-24574 Tuffy
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2017 8:50 pm
by Chris Brame
Aha. "B-17" wasn't in the listing. The search did turn up another Lockbourne ship, this time an E:
Re: Question about 41-24574 Tuffy
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2017 9:04 pm
by Steve Birdsall
Nice work Chris. Ramp Rooster is likely a combat veteran too, judging by that enlarged gun window in the nose.
Re: Question about 41-24574 Tuffy
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2017 9:50 pm
by terveurn
Found these early birds as well - neither E was a combat vet.
Lockbourn 41-2580, 41-9058, 42-30999 small.jpg