found at Alamy
RFC 42-97675
RFC 42-97675
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: RFC 42-97675
It looks like it is marked as an SB-17.
Re: RFC 42-97675
Card does not show any trips to Rome ATSC for SB-17 conversion - last station was Pratt (which was a B-29 OTU field)
My thinking was it might be high visibility markings - for instrument or formation work.
It is another Altus ship (like a bunch of other RFC aircraft)
My thinking was it might be high visibility markings - for instrument or formation work.
It is another Altus ship (like a bunch of other RFC aircraft)
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- Chris Brame
- Posts: 585
- Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 12:08 am
- Location: Yucca Valley, CA
Re: RFC 42-97675
Very interesting to see it sitting all by itself with the star-and-bar stripped off (or painted over in silver) - could this another short-lived postwar memorial or school teaching aid? Looks like it lost half the fin de-icer boot along the way.
Re: RFC 42-97675
Pretty sure it was a memorial -- has all the looks and feel of another attempt at preserving one of these B-17 (and the reason I posted it under RFC heading)Chris Brame wrote: ↑Sat Mar 09, 2019 8:38 pm Very interesting to see it sitting all by itself with the star-and-bar stripped off (or painted over in silver) - could this another short-lived postwar memorial or school teaching aid? Looks like it lost half the fin de-icer boot along the way.
Interesting that even the chin turret has been removed.
Wondering if this is the Cumberland B-17
- Second Air Force
- Posts: 177
- Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2009 11:26 am
Re: RFC 42-97675
Yes, those are probably locally applied stripes for instrument/proficiency training. 2AF used B-17s throughout B-29 Phase training because there were never enough B-29s available to get all the crews' their hours. Generally the airplanes got yellow stripes on wings etc. but the markings seemed to vary throughout 2AF.