44-8095, coded "147", formerly at Roswell as seen here:
Osborne lists it as "Recl Comp 13/10/45" but that's a '48 star-and-bar. Hmmm...
Attn seller: You sent the wrong photo, but... (44-8095 at Keesler)
-
Chris Brame
- Posts: 587
- Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 12:08 am
- Location: Yucca Valley, CA
Attn seller: You sent the wrong photo, but... (44-8095 at Keesler)
I ordered the photo of 42-102737 as Keesler, and the seller sent the wrong photo - but an interesting one nonetheless:
44-8095, coded "147", formerly at Roswell as seen here:
Osborne lists it as "Recl Comp 13/10/45" but that's a '48 star-and-bar. Hmmm...
44-8095, coded "147", formerly at Roswell as seen here:
Osborne lists it as "Recl Comp 13/10/45" but that's a '48 star-and-bar. Hmmm...
Re: Attn seller: You sent the wrong photo, but... (44-8095 at Keesler)
Not the firt time osborne was wrong - looks like she was stricken 1 Jan 51
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
Chris Brame
- Posts: 587
- Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 12:08 am
- Location: Yucca Valley, CA
Re: Attn seller: You sent the wrong photo, but... (44-8095 at Keesler)
Class 12 - museum aircraft? Guess they changed their minds. Same thing happen to 42-102737?